It’s hard to believe it’s been well over five years since COVID and the short-lived COVID recession. Yet here we are still talking about an economic recovery. The post-COVID recovery has been marked by uneven advancement in industry sectors and socioeconomic segments. A term to describe such disparate improvement is a “K-shaped” recovery.

A K-shaped recovery describes an uneven economic rebound where different sectors or income groups diverge, with some thriving while others are declining or participating less. This pattern highlights significant economic

inequality, often showing high-income earners and technology sectors growing while lower-income households and specific industries struggle, creating a “two-track” economy. Unlike other letter-shaped descriptors (e.g., L-shaped, V-shaped, U-shaped, W-shaped), which describe the path of macroeconomic signposts like gross domestic product (GDP) or employment, a K-shaped recovery describes the path of bifurcated groups, such as income earners, industries, or company types.

This split became increasingly evident after COVID. Higher-income white-collar households benefited from remote work options, rising asset values, and digital deployment. In contrast, lower-wage blue-collar workers faced economic headwinds due to prolonged employment difficulties, missed opportunities, and financial pressures. Government stimulus payments and extended unemployment benefits briefly reduced the income gap. However, the resulting high inflation from the government’s cash deluge, as well as the inevitable closure of the cash spigots, widened the divide.

High-level aggregate data shows that U.S. consumers are doing fine. Consumers are spending more and more each year, supported by higher average earnings and larger cash coffers. Yet a closer look demonstrates that the upper-income earners are sustaining the bulk of the spending. Lower-end earners are struggling. For full context, there has always been a segment of the population that has faced more struggles while other segments thrive. The secular trends have indicated a hollowing out of the middle class, something for politicians to debate.

The bifurcation has also affected industries and companies. The genesis can be drawn out from decades ago, when the U.S. (and other developed nations) offshored manufacturing capacity to the third world. Factory jobs were relocated to lower-cost nations, leaving white-collar thinkers to flourish. Hence, technology, biotech, finance, unreplaceable local service companies, as well as corporate managers, research & development positions, and entrepreneurs were able to capitalize on the evolving environment.

The environment may be at an inflection point. Political and societal pressures, companies’ tiring of unheeded intellectual property theft, and national security concerns have forced U.S. companies to reshore manufacturing operations across almost all industries. Dormant factory rehabilitation or new construction should spur a construction boom consisting of raw materials and jobs. Ultimately, those factories need to be filled with workers and machines, translating into prolonged growth.

The K-shaped recovery has accelerated in the post-COVID era. Economic parity is not a likely outcome. Yet, the secular catalysts should narrow the gap in the coming years, something we will be monitoring.